In The News
Boutiques Find Strength in Unity |
By Kris W, Scibiorski
In a world of ever growing legal behemoths, a small band of highly skilled
outsiders is trying to hang on to their hard won niche practices.Admittedly, the efforts of the New Jersey chapter of the International
Network of Boutique Law Firms (INBLF) are unlikely to make much of a
blockbuster action flick, but they do tell an interesting story of how a
singlefocus firm can survive in the increasingly competitive legal
landscape. INBLF is an international organization with chapters generally comprised
of small firms that specialize in a single practice area; only one firm
from a given area is admitted, According to Alan S. Ashkinaze, a Hackensack solo concentrating on
environmental law, the organization "is a network, not just of client
referrals, but also of ideas and resources that helps level the
field" for boutique firms competing with legal giants. The New Jersey chapter, headed by Ashkinaze, is a relatively recent
arrival on the state's legal scene, but already boasts some well known
members, including Lynn Fontaine Newsome, the incoming president of the
New Jersey State Bar Association. And INBLF hopes to use her installation next month to make a name for |

|
| Alan S. Ashkinaze |
| itself among the lawyers, judges and others gathered
for the State Bar's annual meeting in Atlantic City.
|
|
Members of the chapter include bankruptcy practitioner Stephen B.
Ravin of Forman Holt Ehades & Ravin in Rochelle Park, the
intellectual property firm Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholx &
Mentlik in Westfield, the Morristown office of global labor law firm
Jackson Lewis and the tax firm Korf & Rosenblatt, also in
Morristown.
According to Ashkinaze, the group is seeking member candidates
focusing on criminal law, real estate, business transactions, immigration, complex civil litigation and
plaintiff side employment.
Prospective members must pass muster with both chapter members and the
national INBLE Ashkinaze said Newsome's membership "speaks volumes about the caliber
of the law firms in our chapter;' "We're looking for pre eminent leaders in their fields," he
said.Comments about this story may be sent to kris.scibiorski@njlnews.com.
|
Farm's
Neighbors File State Ethics Complaint
By Walter Dawkins
Staff Writer
OLD TAPPAN -- Neighbors involved in a pesticide
complaint against a farm owned by a borough councilman have filed an ethics
complaint against him with the state's Local Finance Board.
The complaint, dated Feb. 1, alleges that Ronald
Binaghi Jr. used his influence as a borough councilman to obtain approval to
build a new 7,000-square-foot greenhouse despite using an outdated 18-year-old
survey of the farm.
"The zoning-permit application clearly
states that the applicant has to provide a recent survey of the property,"
said Alan Ashkinaze, lawyer for the affected residents, James and Wilda Lagrosa.
"Had this been any other resident of Old Tappan, that permit application
would have likely been rejected as incomplete."
"There was no favoritism accepting an old
survey," countered construction official Peter Abballe. "Under the
Right to Farm Act, there are limitations regarding the size. But if [Binaghi]
abides by zoning setbacks, which he does, he can put as many greenhouses as he
wants."
The Lagrosas have complained that greenhouse
ventilating fans from Stokes Farm, owned by Binaghi, blow contaminants directly
onto their property. Wilda Lagrosa has asthma and breathing problems.
While engaged in state mediation with the
Lagrosas, Binaghi received a construction permit in December to build another
greenhouse structure on the 17-acre site. In response, Ashkinaze filed another
grievance with the Bergen County Agriculture Development Board in December.
The new ethics complaint also alleges that
Binaghi submitted a building plan with ventilating fans despite promising no
fans on the zoning permit application.
"That is a prototype plan and that
greenhouse can be installed with or without fans," Abballe responded.
"Mr. Binaghi has no intentions of putting any fans in this
greenhouse."
But Ashkinaze doesn't buy it.
"Clearly that model there is designed for
four ventilating fans," Ashkinaze said. "If it's not an actual
depiction of what he's going to be building, why did the building inspector
approve it?"
Binaghi said that he has followed all the
borough's regulations.
"The reason why the Right to Farm Law was
created was for this exact reason -- for frivolous nuisance complaints," he
said.
Greenhouse
plans further irk neighbors
By Walter Dawkins
Staff Writer
OLD TAPPAN - Residents involved in a pesticide
complaint against a farm owned by a borough councilman are angry at his plans to
build another greenhouse on the site.
James and Wilda Lagrosa have complained that
greenhouse ventilating fans from Stokes Farm, owned by Councilman Ronald Binaghi
Jr., blow contaminants directly onto their property. Wilda Lagrosa has asthma
and breathing problems.
While undergoing state mediation with the
Lagrosas, Binaghi received a construction permit in December to build another
greenhouse structure - close to 7,000 square feet - on the 40-acre site.
"We're negotiating to try to settle the
problem, and he's in the midst of building more greenhouses right next to my
property," said James Lagrosa, saying that Binaghi is "adding insult
to injury."
Binaghi, however, said he has the legal right to
build on his own land.
"I have no idea why they're upset," the
councilman said. "We're well within our zoning requirements."
The Lagrosas' lawyer, Alan Ashkinaze, questioned
the decision.
"Everyone's scratching their head wondering
why Ron [is] building this new greenhouse while we're talking settlement,"
Ashkinaze said.
"He knew that it would really upset the
Lagrosas. He obviously has a lot of property and he didn't have to put this very
large one close to the Lagrosas' property," the attorney said. "To him
it may make business sense, but it does come across as very un-neighborly."
Binaghi's lawyer promised that the neighbors'
needs will be considered.
"As far as I know, anything Mr. Binaghi is
doing is entirely legal and intended to minimize any impact on the neighbors
while continuing to operate the farm," said attorney Alexander Carver, who
also noted that the new structure is replacing a another greenhouse previously
on the site.
According to the zoning permit application, the
new greenhouse will have an open roof design with no ventilation fans.
But Lagrosa is still worried.
"He's putting in almost 7,000 square feet of
vegetation that's going to be on my property line," Lagrosa said.
"Vegetation produces pollen, which adds to my wife's health issues."
Ashkinaze filed another grievance with the Bergen
County Agriculture Development Board in December regarding the new greenhouse.
As with an earlier grievance, it was referred to the state's Office of
Administrative Law because Binaghi sits on the ADB.
Ashkinaze said he expects both issues will be
discussed before administrative law judge Elinor Reiner at the Office of
Administrative Law in Newark on March 24.
State to handle farm complaint
Bergen transfers case to avoid conflict of interest
By Walter Dawkins
The Record Staff writer
Old Tappan- Pesticide complaints against a farm
owned by a borough councilman must be heard by the state's Office of
Administrative Law to avoid a conflict of interest, Bergen County's Agriculture
Development Board ruled Tuesday.
The owner of Stokes Farm, Borough Councilman
Ronald Binaghi Jr. had requested that the board issue a decision on the
complaint by neighbors James and Wilda Lagrosa, as well as a request by the
borough planning board for site approval on 10 greenhouses.
However, the Agriculture Development Board passed
the case to the Office of Administrative Law to avoid the appearance of a
conflict of interest.
"Mr. Binaghi sits on the Bergen County
Agriculture Development Board" said ADB member Kevin Funabashi. "It's
a tight knit group, and we wanted to make sure that it was a fair playing
field".
The Lagrosas' lawyer, Alan Ashkinaze, welcomed
the decision.
"There would be doubts about the integrity
of the process," Ashkinaze said. "And there would always be questions
of whether Mr. Binaghi used his position to influence the decision making."
The Lagrosas have complained for years that
greenhouse ventilating fans on the 40 acre farm blow contaminants directly onto
their property.
Borough Construction Official Peter Abballe last
month also sent a letter to Binaghi explaining that 10 of the property's
greenhouses originally constructed as temporary are actually permanent
structures that "require a formal application to the Planning Board for
site plan approval".
Binaghi, in turn, wrote a March 21 letter to the
County
Agriculture Development Board requesting
assistance in resolving both of these issues.
In the letter, Binaghi called the pesticide
complaints unfounded. Tests in 1995 by the state Department of Environmental
Protection showed no pesticide residue on the fans or in the system's air
conditioner intake, he said.
Binaghi also noted that the Lagrosas had filed a
lawsuit against him in 1994-95 but that "the case was dropped right before
we were to appear in court".
"This whole thing is a do-over and you don't
get to do that in the law", said Binaghi's lawyer, Alexander Carver.
"They had every opportunity to bring their case before the court".
Wilda Lagrosa said that they had run out of money
to pay for the litigation.
On the site plan question, Binaghi cited state
law that he contends exempts the greenhouses. The Right to Farm Act provides
eligible farmers who operate responsibly with protection from restrictive
municipal ordinances and public and private nuisance actions.
"The …issue is really just a matter of
educating our borough about the Right to Farm Act and other exemptions that
farms have in New Jersey", Binaghi wrote.
Ashkinaze, however, argued that the law doesn't
apply.
"The operations of the Stokes farm has
failed to conform to proper agricultural management practices," Ashkinaze
said. "The Binaghis have been improperly ventilating their
greenhouses".
Couple complain of ill wind
Say pesticide fumes come from farm that official owns
By Walter Dawkins
The Record Staff writer
Old Tappan- When James Lagrosa and his wife moved
to DeWolf Raod more than 25 years ago, the Stokes Farm next door had two
greenhouses. Since then, they say, the number had grown to at least 16.
"When they apply pesticides in the
greenhouses, all of that pesticide vapor blows right at my property",
Lagrosa said.
For years, Lagrosa said, he has asked the owners
of the 40 acre Stokes Farm-Borough Councilman Ronald Binaghi Jr. and his father,
a former councilman-to move the ventilating fans, to no avail.
However, he hopes that may change now that the
property has come under scrutiny.
Two weeks ago, borough Construction Official
Peter Abballe sent a letter to the younger Binaghi, explaining that four
greenhouses originally constructed as temporary are actually permanent
structures that "require a formal application to the Planning Board for
site plan approval".
Nearly 15 years ago, the state granted five-year
temporary exemptions for greenhouses, said the Lagrosas' lawyer, Alan Ashkinaze.
However, he said, it "doesn't appear that Binaghi senior, a councilman at
the time, ever made a formal application- and if he did, he clearly never made a
renewal application for another five years".
Last week, Ashkinaze sent a letter to Abballe,
asking him to "issue an order directing Mr. Binaghi to immediately take
down these structures and/or cease and desist operating the existing greenhouses
until all necessary approvals have been obtained".
"It's our hope that the borough will do the
right thing, and that is to enforce the local and state regulations and force
the Binaghis to be in compliance with all necessary regulations", Ashkinaze
said.
As of Wednesday, Borough Administrator Greg Hart
said, the Binaghis had not yet submitted an application to the Planning Board
for site plan approval and that the farm was operating as usual.
It is in the hands of our borough attorney,"
said Mayor Victor Polce. "He has done the appropriate research, and we are
moving to try to get some finality to this situation, which is to the
satisfaction of both the Binaghis and the Lagrosas".
Borough Attorney Allen Bell refused comment.
When contacted by The Record, the younger Binaghi
responded with a telephone message: " I serve on the Borough Council, and
we just got a message from our borough attorney that we are not supposed to
comment to the media until this plays out. So, I apologize, but I can't comment
right now. But I will be able to in the future."
Rea Epstein, chairman of the Old Tappan Planning
Borad, said she was sure the younger Binaghi will take the appropriate action.
"Mr. Binaghi is a person who is very
concerned about the future of the town and about the well-being of the people in
town", Epstein said. "I'm sure he's going to look for resolution to
this right away. He's not someone who shirks his civic responsibility by any
means".
Lagrosa wonder why, then, he's been unable to get
any satisfaction.
"My wife's health has deteriorated. She has
asthma and breathing problems. She has never had that before".
"Over the years, we've asked the owners of
the property, Ronald Binaghi senior and junior, if they could have the fans
moved and they refused", he added.
"This had been going on for years",
said Lagrosa's wife, Wilda. "Binaghi junior had been permitted to do
whatever he wants, and both the father and son have always felt they were above
the law".
Nets' yard sale
By Jeff Roberts - Staff Writer
FRANKLIN LAKES - Alan Ashkinaze was sold.
Nets owner Bruce Ratner held court just a few
feet from him under one of the two tents in the spacious back yard. Ashkinaze's
8-year-old son, Josh, got to take a picture with forward Brian Scalabrine. Then
he talked basketball with coach Lawrence Frank.
"It certainly brings the basketball team a
lot closer that the players, the coaches and the owner are not just people you
see on your TV screen. They're real people," said Ashkinaze, a Hackensack
lawyer.
So he bought a full season ticket package. And
maybe more importantly, he bought into the Nets.
The question is, for how long?
The Nets are reaching out to their fans and right
into their back yards. They kicked off the latest initiative in a campaign to be
a kinder, gentler, more intimate and accessible franchise Wednesday night by
throwing a party at the home of season-ticket holders Cesar and Diana Shapiama.
It will be followed by dozens more in the Ticket
Influencer Program, where other season-ticket holders will host their family,
friends and business associates - prospective ticket buyers - to share some food
and drink and talk Nets basketball with the owner, front office personnel and
players, and maybe buy some seats.
Judging by the results - smiles, networking, oh
and 20 full season ticket plans sold just Wednesday - the plan is working.
But despite assurances from Nets officials that
the prospective move to Brooklyn in 2008 is not a topic among fans, the new
ticket buyers say it will test their allegiance, no matter how intimate and
friendly the team is.
"I probably wouldn't go to Brooklyn,"
said Ashkinaze, who lives in Oradell. "That would end it. I like the
convenience of the Meadowlands. I think it's a great arena. It's close for us,
accessible."
Ted Gatto, a pharmacist from East Hanover, beamed
after talking to Frank. But when Brooklyn came up, his face scrunched up.
"I think it would be a detriment to the
organization," he said. "I don't want them to leave. I strongly oppose
them leaving New Jersey. Just the commute alone and the parking situation - it
would be questionable," that he would follow.
The Nets say they are proud of their Jersey
roots, at least until the Brooklyn issue resolves itself. They'll cross that
bridge when they come to it.
"Brooklyn's been a non-issue so far,"
said Wayne's Brett Yormark, president and CEO of the parent company of the Nets,
Nets Sports & Entertainment. "Ÿ... What we're telling people is for
the next few years we're going to be here. We're going to market like we've
never marketed before as if we're staying for another 20 and we'll give them a
reason to follow us to Brooklyn."
Ratner is gambling that they will. It's a $450
million gamble at the minimum, the price of the proposed Brooklyn arena.
He cannot offer a championship, or even an
Eastern Conference title for the team's fans to rally around this off-season.
But he can come to your house. He can look you in the eye and shake your hand
and talk basketball with your kids. And he can bring president Rod Thorn and
Scalabrine and Frank with him.
"People first of all will follow us no
matter what, whether we're Brooklyn or whether we're Jersey," Ratner said.
"Because they're Nets fans. You bleed being a fan. As a kid, I grew up in
Ohio and I'll always have some place in my heart for the Cleveland Browns.
"I think you're always a Nets fan."
Ratner said some fans may reduce the number of
games they attend, but they will still remain loyal. He compared the Nets'
prospective move to the Jets shifting from Shea Stadium to the Meadowlands - a
matter of miles, not culture.
Kevin Codey, 20, son of acting Governor Codey, is
not so sure.
"I'm not pleased," he said. "It
would be tougher to go to games. I hate going out that way to begin with."
Ashkinaze, who will share his tickets with a
partner, plans to take his son to the games as well as his clients. Michael
Encarnacion, deputy mayor of Paterson and owner of a real estate firm, also
bought a full season plan to share with his business partner.
They're excited about the Nets. They're excited
to have met Ratner and Thorn and Frank in such an intimate setting. But for now,
their enthusiasm stays on this side of the Hudson.
"It would be hard for me to go to
Brooklyn," said Encarnacion. "They wouldn't be the Nets from New
Jersey then. They'd be the Nets from Brooklyn."
All Articles Re-printed with permission
Alan S. Ashkinaze and Original Owner
|